June 10, 2009

What's wrong with EUSD

Dear blog reader,

In the interest of brevity we’ll get right to the point, though this first post will likely be longer than it should be, since we're talking about the troubles of the Encinitas Union School District. There are many of us in Encinitas and South Carlsbad with deep connections to the Encinitas Union School District. Some of us are parents, some are teachers, some are classified employees, and some are just concerned community members who once had students at EUSD. We have in common a deep concern about the current state and direction of the district. The tenure of Lean King, his tyrannical and heavy-handed tactics and his general divisiveness, have had a terribly and profoundly corrosive effect on almost every aspect of this school district that was once a collegial and community-friendly place. Still, while Lean King has been the primary agent of this negative change, we also lay blame at the feet of the board of trustees who have remained blissfully ignorant (possibly purposefully ignorant) as they’ve rubber-stamped the superintendent’s actions since his arrival. They have presided over his systematic dismantling of the goodwill and camaraderie which had been painstakingly built up by Dr. Doug Devore, the prior superintendent. During his tenure, Dr. Devore was definitely a “uniter not a divider” and it’s fair to say that the district was at a high point in terms of its good relationships with stakeholders when Dr. Devore retired. The teacher and classified unions were on good terms with the district, the PTA and EEF folks worked well with the district, and the district’s relations with community groups and city governments were very functional and cordial. Without exception, all of those relationships have suffered severe setbacks under the current district leadership, and some have collapsed altogether, generally as a result of the tactics and manipulations that are Lean King’s modus operandi. Where once there was trust there is now distrust, where there was optimism there is pessimism, and where there were groups working toward common purposes there are now adversaries with mutual suspicions.

We were all, as a community, willing to give Mr. King a chance when he arrived, and to overlook what seemed to many of us to be a poor choice of superintendent on the part of the school board. In retrospect, that willingness to give him the benefit of the doubt was a mistake, but it was, nonetheless, the right thing to do. How could we have known that the board of trustees, which had been so ably guided and advised by Dr. Devore, would allow themselves to be led so blindly and wildly astray by a slick manipulator whose primary gift is orchestrated self-promotion? And then, as those early months passed, the climate of open communication and consensus was replaced by fear and intimidation, which then seemed to move down the org. chart like a weed. From the district office staff onward to the principals and school staff, to the teachers and parents, and finally to the community at large and the city folks. The advice all around became, “keep low and don’t make waves, or else”. Of course, with hindsight being 20-20, it’s clear that we’ve all waited too long to speak up with one voice, and that by our lack of action we’ve allowed things to disintegrate to such a state.

This blog grew out of a conversation that started out with the hopeful idea that the new superintendent will absolutely recognize the disastrous damage that his predecessor has caused, and the extent to which the school board is oblivious or complicit. Then we had a realization: The school board has regarded Lean King as some sort of hero on a pedestal and has made no secret of that, so it’s unlikely that the new guy will aspire to do anything different, and could see the emulation of Mr. King as his path of least resistance. This frightening realization, that the school board’s Lean-love will cause the new superintendent to use the disastrous past four years as some kind of playbook, made it clear that all EUSD stakeholders must speak with some cohesiveness, and that we must give people a way to do so without the fear of reprisal that has kept so many at bay since King’s arrival. Though we (the bloggers) are involved in EUSD in various ways, we all regularly hear conversations, and have conversations, about how things seem so tense, how the teachers and administrators are on edge and the staff seems angry, the parent groups are fighting with each other and with the district, and the superintendent has so alienated the City of Encinitas folks that it’s unlikely there will be any constructive dialog in that area for some time.

So, when we hear a conversation, we’re going to put it here, assuming it’s not told to any of us in confidence. (Hence, the blog name: As EUSD in Conversation.) It’s surprising how each of us, in her/his own role, hears the same things, over and over and over, and then the people who are venting say, “But, we can’t do really do anything about this, right?” Well, in theory, even the school district is a democracy, and all it will take is enough people wanting the same thing to get something done. That may mean that the current rubber-stamp board will suddenly get concerned and re-involve themselves. More likely, it seems to us, they are too out of touch and self-absorbed in being “The Board” to really “get it”, and that will probably mean that the election of 2010 will be a watershed event. In fairness to the newest board member, she‘s too new on the scene to be categorized one way or the other, so our jury is still out about her. She may prove better, or just as bad, but the four veterans have definitely been disastrous since Mr. King arrived and began so expertly pulling their strings. In any case, something will change. What happens next is for all of us, the involved and concerned, to determine. One thing is evident: Things must not continue as they have been if the district is to be returned to some semblance of its former goodness and high caliber. If you feel strongly about this as well, please join us in discussion

12 comments:

  1. Thank God - somebody's finally telling it like it is! You have no idea how frustrated I have been at the situation in my son's school. My husband and I are the type to get involved, volunteer, and take an active part in the education of our kids, but I have yet to see anything but discouraging treatment toward our principal and teachers, and parents for that matter, from the district, starting with a terrible interaction we witnessed at a PTA meeting between the superintendent and parents. I regret having voted some of those clowns into office. Please keep up the excellent commentaries!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It will make for good conversation if you combine all our efforts. There already is a blog with some demonstration of stamina.

    http://eusdobserver.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for the original post, and for initiating this conversation. I myself am a public school educator (not in EUSD) with 16+ years of teaching and administrative experience. While I agree with most of your post, we must all remember who is ultimately responsible for the current state of our district and schools: We the voters within the EUSD. Why would ANYONE vote for the senior board members is beyond me. Regan has been on the board for almost TWENTY years? Skiljan for SEVENTEEN? Parker for FIFTEEN? Let's wake up and smell what we've been shoveling! I saw a glimmer of hope when they hired Devore as superintendent, but that light faded soon after Doug's retirement. The BOARD picks the superintendent, the BOARD hires the principals and teachers, and the BOARD is who is responsible for the lack of cooperation between the admin and the certificated employees. So who keeps voting in the same board members who cause such divisiveness? The same voters who brought back the incumbent cronies and loons to the city council! Most people see the word incumbent on the ballot, and it makes them feel comfortable that they have the choice to maintain the status quo. I am a firm believer in the democratic process, but sometimes I wish we could see a nice little revolution in local government.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Anonymous 5:50pm,
    Have you actually read that EUSD Observer blog? That thing seems to be a now-and-then scrapbook of one guy's stream of consciousness, and he's kind of all
    over the place. He (Mike Honsberger – sp?) is a parent at Paul Ecke Central, but he's also a technology teacher in the Del Mar district, so he mainly goes on about technology as opposed to the big picture. Also, his blog posts used to be very critical of Lean King
    and the administration, but suddenly he's praising King & Grider for their non-existent support of stuff (see his post "4/21 Board Roundup"). Personally, I think the guy is angling for a job in Encinitas, since only a last-minute fundraising reprieve by
    Del Mar parents saved his job this year (see U/T article here:
    http://www3.signonsandiego.com/stories/2009/apr/15/bn15delmar-less-ayoffs/
    ). He might have good intentions, but he's a lurker, not a do-er, and he's too much about technology. Tech is not the answer to what's
    wrong with EUSD. To paraphrase a well-worn political sound-bite, "It's the administration, stupid!" I have to agree with
    the comments of Anonymous 11:45am: Unless (and until) the voters realize what's going on with the board, nothing will get any better.
    Oh, any by the way, a note to the bloggers here (aseusdinconversation) - nice job, awesome "manifesto".
    You people hit it ON THE HEAD!

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's more to the story of Mr. Honsperger. He's got board member Carol Skiljan in his pocket, or the other way around. Her daughter is a teacher here, so he's got her ear. Ironically, the word is that her daughter, Mrs. Conn, doesn't talk district business with her mom because they have serious differences. Pretty bad when a board member's kin won't talk shop with her!

    ReplyDelete
  6. And ANOTHER ADMINISTRATOR BITES THE DUST under Lean King! News yesterday: Dr. Debbie Blow, Encinitas Asst. Superintendent of Educational Services has announced that she's leaving Encinitas to become the superintendent of Cambria district up north. The word is that she applied for King's job and was pretty mistreated, so she's calling it a day, having worked at Encinitas since the mid 90's, opened a new school for us, and worked tremendously hard in her current position. Must have been tired of being beaten up, beaten down, and disrespected. And tired of King taking credit for her work! Is this new job a promotion for her? Of course. But does somebody just up and leave an organization to which she's dedicated the last 12 or 15 years of her life, for one step up on the short ladder of education? I don't think so. Blogmeisters: You seem well informed about the doings of the district – what do you have to say about this development? And don't be so politically correct. Your whole initial “Why we're here and what we're all about” post was on the money, but seriously, take off the gloves and call 'em like you see 'em. Whose feelings are you worried about hurting?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Word on the street is -we have 7 new aggresive principals and nancy cunnigham appling for the job. Isn't it time to save money? Just hire a curriculm director for half the price. Is the Board going to appoint someone (Nancy) during the interim- let's hope not.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I hope we see a rebound in our EUSD administrators now that Dr. King departs. I've only been in the district 2 years, but his stovepiping and fear tactics have been truly amazing to behold. As a active PTA member I can't believe the wishy washy antics that I have witnessed over the past two years. I do think technology is one of the biggest issues here in our district - the lack of active management of it and lack of anyone at the top having any experience in it is a significant problem.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I also feel administrators are being overpaid. For instance, Randy Cunningham's wife is making over $100,000 per year as an administrator, still, as far as I know. She had given notice as she was to be the Director of Rhodes Academy, a private school in Encinitas. But after the scandal broke, she went back to EUSD, which had already accepted her resignation! She had to know about her husband's "ill-gotten gains" and the bribes given to him and his family through defense contractors.

    I will post, separately, the letter I wrote to Encinitas City Council regarding the surplus property which is Pacific View. I just sent a copy of it to Lean King. When will he be leaving?

    Dear Mr. King,

    Congratulations on your plans for retirement. Please help the citizens of Encinitas to preserve the surplus school site, Pacific View, so that it may be used, at least in part, for a pocket park.

    I feel there is enough interest in the community that a foundation could be set up as was done for the Boathouses, which are also historic landmarks.

    Your memo to City Council was not strictly abiding by the Naylor Act. The Naylor Act requires that the timeline is from when a property is leased or offered for sale. Eight years prior to that the surplus school property must have been used, at least in part, for playgrounds, fields and open space. The property was so used before you leased it to the City of Encinitas for a temporary public works yard, and the City paved over the playing fields for more parking.

    According to the state law, you must offer 30% of the land at 25% of the currently appraised value. A formal appraisal report must include in its calculations that we are in Stage II drought and no new water meter permits are being given out, according to Council decision. Also, the appraised value would be for the current zoning, which is not for residential homes, but for public/semi-public.

    The City would not be required to purchase the entire site at this time. Paying $1 million, or less, for 30% of the property would insure a place for the old schoolhouse, not crowded in with high density development, or amidst another housing tract. As you know, Moonlight Lofts sits almost entirely vacant, and Pacific Station construction is underway. This downtown area does not need more development. We do need more open space, and a pocket park, perhaps with one half field, would be ideal. Half fields are normally used for youth soccer, not full sized fields. I remember my daughters playing soccer and softball at Pacific View. This could be an asset to the entire community.

    Thank you for your attention to the letter, which I previously sent to Encinitas City Council. Again, I will post my letter to Encinitas Council in separate comment, to follow.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:00:04 -0700
    To: "council@cityofencinitas.org"

    Subject: Pacific View should not be rezoned or developed as commercial property

    City of Encinitas

    Dear Council Members, City Clerk, City Manager, City Attorney, and Planning Commissioners:

    I took the time to read the Naylor Act, which is Education Code Sections 17485-17500. According to California statutory law, the Naylor Act is triggered if eight years prior to the School District’s deciding to either lease or sell surplus school property, the site was used as playgrounds, which, as you are well aware, Pacific View School was, until the City of Encinitas leased it and paved over the fields. The property was then used for a public works yard, and was leased for one dollar per year.

    Therefore, the Naylor Act does apply. Of course attorneys could fight this out in court, but I feel our public interests should be paramount, and the new superintendent of EUSD would not want that kind of fight on his hands. I wonder if our City Attorney, Glenn Sabine has carefully read the act? If so, he should be advising the City that because the property was originally donated to the school district, the City would have the right to purchase 30% of it at 25% on the dollar of its appraised value. The Naylor Act allows a city to purchase 30% of total surplus school property. I am unsure of whether or not EUSD has other surplus property, but whether it does or not, the City would not have to purchase the entire piece. If the Citizens want to purchase the entire property, the City should do so, at the correctly appraised value, not $10 million. I know I would vote for a bond for this purchase, if the citizens were allowed ta public vote, say during an election, to cut down on costs.

    If the City does decide to purchase the entire piece, it should definitely have a proper assessment, with a proper Appraisal Report, which, as you also know, it did not have for the Mossy Property. We paid entirely too much for the Mossy Property, although at least one professional appraiser had pointed out that there was no appraisal report to the City Manager before that property was bought in supposedly "turn key" condition, for an excessive amount, which location for the Public Works Yard turned out not turnkey at all.

    The City should not rezone the Pacific View property. Development there is now problematic, at best, with the drought and new water meter restriction requirements. Lean King is on his way out. This needs to be negotiated with the new Superintendent of the Encinitas Union School District. There is no reason why EUSD could not continue to lease the entire property to the City for a very reasonable amount, for the benefit of the neighborhood and the community, as a community garden/open space, or for playgrounds. If the City refuses to rezone, as it should, there would be no alternative, with the water meter restrictions.

    Whatever happens, the City should make sure that it purchases at least 30% of the 2.84 acres, which equals .0852 acre, for a pocket park, open space, playing grounds, or perhaps a community garden that would close at sunset. The price would be only $1 million for over 4/5 of an acre in a wonderful location. The person who originally donated the land would be happy that local school children and seniors, anyone could walk to the park and enjoy its amenities, work in the public gardens. New York City has these types of community gardens in residential areas. The zoning should not be changed to accommodate developers.

    Thank you for taking the time to read and consider, and distribute this e-mail correspondence. Please retain this as a public record regarding official city business relevant to the Pacific View agenda item set for the June 10, 2009 regular City Council Meeting.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have to agree with Anonymous 10:41. I've ad the opportunity to work on a few school projects with my son that involved "technology", and I was amazed to see that the stock of computers was generally ancient and had not changed since our older son was a student there. When I asked the principal about this on a couple of occasions, I was first told that Dr. King was a big fan of thin client computers because he'd seen them at his last district, and a few of those showed up. Then I was told he wanted to buy small laptops and some of those showed up at the school, yet all the time I was noticing "special" teachers getting Macintosh laptops. It seemed like there was a direction in technolgoy at one point, when our older son was in in elementary school, but that got lost somewhere in the last few of years. I give kudos to the technical guys - they seem to keep things running including the rag-tag machines, and they've pulled a rabbit out of the hat for my son's teacher on several occasions when she had some technological mishaps. So I'm not faulting them. But as for technology direction, the whole place seemed to be cast adrift within the last few years. Well - now that I say that, four years does line up with the change of superintendent. Anyway, maybe the new guy will have a clue and put some money where his mouth is.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hooray, hooray ...June 29, 2009 at 6:15 PM

    Hooray, hooray ...

    ... tomorrow is King's last day!

    Let's hope Wed brings a new era of openess, accountability and willingness to listen to parents.

    ReplyDelete